The title was obviously just an attention grabber implying a little about the content, it was the title of the original article after all. I upvoted because th

The title was obviously just an attention grabber implying a little about the content, it was the title of the original article after all. I upvoted because the article weighed in a little on the debate initiated by the other article recently posted. Both made some sloppy claims but also enough interesting points to warrant attention in my opinion. Edit: I shouls also note most of the readers of HN aren't cancer researchers. They may not spend as much time thinking about this as you, which is why I think instead of this thread, your contribution in the comments would have been more valuable.