4 ms·
Ok, since you asked. You've explained why 100% of 'pedantic try-hards' who reply to your technical posts, shouldn't. Now you want comments? You even have a cons
by yesenadam 8y ago
Ok, since you asked. You've explained why 100% of 'pedantic try-hards' who reply to your technical posts, shouldn't. Now you want comments? You even have a conspiracy theory about their usernames. You were 'baited' into this article, now people who (I assume) don't like to read your whiny, abusive tone are 'censoring' you? I don't know why you ever comment on anything, since it sounds like, according to you, it's worse than a total waste of time. Except when you get to return the ill-feeling in a rant like that. Please do something you enjoy instead! Life's too short.
- CoolGuySteve 8y agoWhat makes you think the set is 100%? People can both be wrong and derail, like you did just now.
- yesenadam 8y agoRhetorical question: Can you really not see the irony of complaining about pedants who miss the point, then commenting like that on here? Well, I've learnt my lesson about explaining downvotes - you just wanted someone to attack.
- dang 8y agoPlease don't get personal in comments here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html