3 ms·
Yes, “hard” scifi is a sub-genre that adheres to physics as much as we know it to be true - no faster-than-light travel, for instance. Arthur C. Clarke and his
by ericfrenkiel 8y ago
Yes, “hard” scifi is a sub-genre that adheres to physics as much as we know it to be true - no faster-than-light travel, for instance. Arthur C. Clarke and his 2001 series as well as Nivens and his Ringworld series would be good examples, whereas Dan Simmons and his Hyperion Cantos trilogy, while extremely well-written, wouldn’t qualify.
- JumpCrisscross 8y ago> Nivens and his Ringworld series would be good examples Nivens features several not-quite-scientific features, though he does a better job than many at keeping them constrained. I still wouldn’t consider him a hard science fiction author.
- stochastic_monk 8y agoI think Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke (as mentioned), and Michael Crichton are better examples of hard science fiction.
- sbmassey 8y agoNiven has FTL all over, and lots of psychic powers type stuff to boot.
- GW150914 8y agoI’ll never understand the voting patterns here. The plot of Ringworld is literally predicated on a second generation FTL dive. I love the series and it’s semi-hard sci-fi, but the whole thing is predicated on a hyperdrive, and how a civilization with it would build and live differently from a vastly powerful species without it.
- nine_k 8y agodon't forget Peter Watts.
- BurningFrog 8y agoI just tried to make a dumb joke about this very hard material on the star. I deserve the downvotes. I'm not even a real dad.