3 ms·
Skepticism about expert classification of accidents as "impossible" is a completely rational argument given the history. Again, I'm not trying to have either d
by emiliobumachar 8y ago
Skepticism about expert classification of accidents as "impossible" is a completely rational argument given the history.
Again, I'm not trying to have either debate. I'm just arguing against conflating them, at least within each single country. Once we're policing other countries about keeping off bombs, then, sure, forbidding their power plants might make sense.
- bayesian_horse 8y agoRationally it makes sense to separate the idea of nuclear contamination from casual use of small nuclear weapons from nuclear contamination from nuclear power accidents or waste disposal problems. Emotionally it doesn't make sense at all.