7 ms·
It's about stability. It is much easier to break a dynamically linked or interpreted script than a statically linked binary. The worst case of fixing a system w
by JepZ 8y ago
It's about stability. It is much easier to break a dynamically linked or interpreted script than a statically linked binary. The worst case of fixing a system with a software failure is booting a live-cd and replace the files which cause trouble, but a broken shell and sometimes also a broken package manager are precisely those cases when you have to boot a live-cd.
- marmaduke 8y ago> It is much easier to break a dynamically linked or interpreted script than a statically linked binary If we’re talking about new code, why is this the case?