If you used better approaches, the recipes sampled would be a lot more fun to evaluate and discuss. With generative stuff, there's a sort of inverse uncanny val

If you used better approaches, the recipes sampled would be a lot more fun to evaluate and discuss. With generative stuff, there's a sort of inverse uncanny valley: it's only when it gets very close to perfect that it's really interesting to look at, because that's where you get the most creativity and reactions like 'I can't believe that worked' or 'maybe...'. For example, I find that sukiyaki paper a lot more fun to read than OP, because the recipes are meaningful rather than random gibberish. ('cranked red onion' is not actually amusing, it's just gibberish).