5 ms·

what's wrong with the article?

• gnulinux 8y ago
  Oh wait I'm so sorry, did someone change the original post? When I click the title now an article I never read pops up. I was ranting about this article: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/01/30/scientists-mapped-otzi-icemans-61-tattoos/#.W5xhfS2ZNTZ http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/01/30/scienti... It's just very poor quality and sensational.
  • irrational 8y ago
    What, the word "tats" isn't used in standard scientific reporting?
  • the_duke 8y ago
    The new link isn't better. Very sensationalist.