4 ms·
PowerShell went for "pwsh" instead of "posh" because posh is already a name of a shell - https://www.commandlinux.com/man-page/man1/posh.1.html https://www.comm
by jodrellblank 8y ago
PowerShell went for "pwsh" instead of "posh" because posh is already a name of a shell - https://www.commandlinux.com/man-page/man1/posh.1.html https://www.commandlinux.com/man-page/man1/posh.1.html
- dguaraglia 8y agoDamn. Maybe go for "Posh Again" instead, in the bash tradition :)