> I want to empower workers by giving them options, rather than by refereeing companies. That's very interesting. Denmark, IIRC, does or recently did have a si

> I want to empower workers by giving them options, rather than by refereeing companies. That's very interesting. Denmark, IIRC, does or recently did have a similar political deal between employers and employees: Low restrictions on the labor market in return for high unemployment insurance. The effects were similar to what you describe: Employees with more freedom, not being tied to jobs, able to take risks, and a much more liquid labor market. (If you're interested, I think the article was in Foreign Affairs maybe five years ago, but no promises.) I've always liked that concept but didn't think of taking it to the extent that you're suggesting. I'd still put some limits on it, but that's a very interesting idea. Thanks. I'll add that I'd define the safety net as providing food, shelter, healthcare, and all the education they can make use of (with something like a GPA minimum to prevent waste of that resource). At this point in history, with the incredible wealth of advanced economies, nobody should face shortages of those things. Good talking to you.