3 ms·
Wouldn't it make more sense if it was called "Ponsh" then? Heck, now that I think of it, "posh" would be a perfect name for a Python-powered shell.
by dguaraglia 8y ago
Wouldn't it make more sense if it was called "Ponsh" then? Heck, now that I think of it, "posh" would be a perfect name for a Python-powered shell.
- gricardo99 8y agoPerhaps “pysh”, although that has some negative connotations.
- jodrellblank 8y agoPowerShell went for "pwsh" instead of "posh" because posh is already a name of a shell - https://www.commandlinux.com/man-page/man1/posh.1.html https://www.commandlinux.com/man-page/man1/posh.1.html
- dguaraglia 8y agoDamn. Maybe go for "Posh Again" instead, in the bash tradition :)