28 ms·
> China and Taiwan have a long standing agreement that they are both part of a single China More info please, this isn't what I know of Taiwan.
by philliphaydon 8y ago
> China and Taiwan have a long standing agreement that they are both part of a single China
More info please, this isn't what I know of Taiwan.
- platinumrad 8y agoIt depends on how the "One China Policy" is interpreted, and it is interpreted quite differently quite differently by different factions within Taiwan. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17982858 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17982858
- perennate 8y agoMy understanding is that the Taiwanese government has not renounced claims over mainland China because doing so would piss off China, who would view it as a step towards independence. Aside from escalation of tensions, pissing off PRC would likely worsen economic relations, which I think would be more damaging to Taiwan than to China (according to Wikipedia, China is Taiwan's largest import/export partner). Absent the political/economic ramifications, I believe only a very small percentage of Taiwan's population would mind if Taiwan renounced these claims. Even "pro-reunification" KMT has stepped a bit back from its reunification stance, e.g. setting conditions like "democracy, economic development to a level near that of Taiwan, and equitable wealth distribution" for China before reunification can occur (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan). So, for many, the only reason to support an "eventual reunification" stance is it'd strengthen the economy, i.e., they don't mind China playing its word games if it means peace and Taiwan prospering. This doesn't mean "pro-independence" pan-green party ignores the economic effects. They argue for developing economic relations with other countries, to reduce economic dependence on China, and thus make independence more practical.