4 ms·
Good on them for shipping. Followed them for awhile, but eventually went with a keyboard.io. I'm rarely traveling whilst needing a dedicated keyboard, and all t
by tashoecraft 8y ago
Good on them for shipping. Followed them for awhile, but eventually went with a keyboard.io. I'm rarely traveling whilst needing a dedicated keyboard, and all the extra add ons weren't necessary for me.
- ake1 8y agogot a keyboard.io as well but gave up on trying to learn typing on ortho.
- kabdib 8y agoYeah, I had high hopes for the keyboard.io, but it turned out to be an ergonomic disaster. After a couple of weeks trying to transition, I just gave up. It's a shame. I'd buy a keyboard from keyboard.io with a less radically different layout. I don't think I could reprogram the existing one to the point where I could retain my current typing speed.
- jimmy1 8y agoI was curious so I looked at their marketing vid. "I found a bunch of research about keyboard design [...] and every keyboard design in the last 20 years has flat out ignored it" It also seems they flat out ignored the single most beneficial feature for a keyboard on hand ergonomics: having your hands rest at a negative slope. The UHK seems to have this feature.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- opencl 8y agoIt does support negative tilt, though only with the palm rest attached.
- tashoecraft 8y agoYou can just spin the base and have whatever slope you want
- jimmy1 8y agointeresting, thanks for pointing that out. I am attracted more to the finishes on the keyboardio than the uhk, it will be a tough decision for me