I haven't read his book, so I can't speak to his arguments, but I did want to say that I don't think that doing so puts us exactly where we were before OOP. Cl

I haven't read his book, so I can't speak to his arguments, but I did want to say that I don't think that doing so puts us exactly where we were before OOP. Classes can still be parameterized in a way that modules in procedural languages can't, which opens up all sorts of flexibility that wasn't available, or at least was exceedingly awkward to accomplish, in non-OO procedural languages. For example, you're going to want some sort of post-procedural language if you want to use dependency inversion.