5 ms·
Ha. I strongly disagree, for many reasons. The main one being that they have such terrible software devs (sorry but lately every Apple release was a fiasco) tha
by kjullien 8y ago
Ha. I strongly disagree, for many reasons. The main one being that they have such terrible software devs (sorry but lately every Apple release was a fiasco) that they couldn't possibly have a "safe" and "private" environment, not intentionally obviously, but they keep showing their lack of concern and involvement time after time.
- toasterlovin 8y agoFWIW, they recently deployed a new filesystem to 1 billion devices with a software update. I'm pretty sure that qualifies them as a competent engineering organization.
- kjullien 8y agoSo in your opinion APFS ins't a failure that barely worked for about half a year after it's public release ? Caused problems for almost every software where a patch was needed by the devs (namely docker, sure you could find more examples). I actually had to reformat my drive because Disk Util.app on a APFS formatted drive could not handle bootcamp correctly on release and it foobared my entire drive. To their credit they get it right when you give them some months and a userbase of millions of people. I simply wish they did all that before they actually publicly release their latest botch and enable it by default on every device.
- toasterlovin 8y agoBelieve me, if APFS was a huge disaster, it never woulda left the front page of this website. Instead it was all griping about RAM and keyboards on the MacBook Pro.