There's no end to your moral policing of Amazon's wearhouse policies. No matter what they do, you'll find a reason to demonize them. But just to play along wit

There's no end to your moral policing of Amazon's wearhouse policies. No matter what they do, you'll find a reason to demonize them. But just to play along with your line of attack - the answer is obvious - it would affect their bottom line. Their retail is legendary for being unprofitable, there's very little wiggle room for increasing costs. What would you rather have - a large army of employed, productive wearhouse workers, whose experience at Amazon opens up further opportunities, or an army of unemployed? Like I cited initially, the permutations have played out before, at etsy. Etsy's flat growth, and reduction in employment, while simultaneously cutting back on previously granted generous endowments is what will result if Amazon does what the social media lynch mobs of Justice seek