4 ms·
Thanks, it gets clearer. As a matter of fact I'm both knowledgeable in building things in Python and Go, Node and PHP too. And others. But, admittedly, for 'big
by bpizzi 8y ago
Thanks, it gets clearer. As a matter of fact I'm both knowledgeable in building things in Python and Go, Node and PHP too. And others. But, admittedly, for 'big' things I tend to lean on Go nowadays (edit: mainly because I need to deliver on-premise, OS-aware applications).
It seems like you think there's a "build process" with Go because you're accustomed to python/pyenv (or whatever is your env manager of choice), in which cas you need to known that there's no such thing with Go.
The two following course of actions are the same:
- "apt-get docker; docker pull {project-url}; docker start {project-url}"
- "apt-get golang; git pull {project-url}; go run .go" (the last Go 1.11 will take care of dependencies at build time)
You can't as easily do "apt-get python; git pull {url}; python .py", unless the program is really simple, because there's such questions as "python2 or 3?" or "pyenv, virtualenv or anaconda?", obligatory XKCD here: https://xkcd.com/1987 https://xkcd.com/1987.
But it's totally ok not to bother learning the compilation command of a given project's language and rely on Docker, really I'm ok with that, doing it myself from time to time. My initial point was on app delivery to final users.
- ric2b 8y agoYou're right that the multiple solutions for Python make things confusing and prevent you from using the same method for every project, hopefully we'll start to standardize on pipenv, which makes the process: "apt install python3 python3-pipenv; git pull {url}; pipenv sync; python3 .py" pipenv sync sets up a virtual env and pulls all the dependencies.