3 ms·
In the US, and perhaps other common law jurisdictions, there is an exception to the hearsay evidence rule for medical records. [1] This reflects or is a result
by ballenf 8y ago
In the US, and perhaps other common law jurisdictions, there is an exception to the hearsay evidence rule for medical records. [1]
This reflects or is a result of the same root cause as the issue discussed here: there is an almost mystical air surrounding items written by a medical doctor, even if what's written is just parroting the patient.
Or maybe the two things aren't related, but they're both weird in the day and age where TV commercials urge us to prod our doctor into prescribing the latest drug.
[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803 https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803
- dannyw 8y agoThere's nothing strange about that. Read further and "Records of a Regularly Conducted Activity" is also excepted, and so is absense of records. It's almost like a timestamp tool. "One year ago I suffered from XYZ" has little value. But a piece of paper, written by a doctor, that confirms one year ago you said you suffered from XYZ, is worth more. Doesn't mean XYZ is true, but it means you said that one year in advance.