3 ms·
Whether or not it was done in good faith is irrelevant because it does not and cannot compensate for the harm Amazon/Bezos has caused.
by staticautomatic 8y ago
Whether or not it was done in good faith is irrelevant because it does not and cannot compensate for the harm Amazon/Bezos has caused.
- icelancer 8y agoRight, Amazon is purely net negative. Billions of dollars of wealth, the vast majority created on the backs of laborers via exploitation the world 'round. I get the shtick. I hear it enough. It's not true, but it's a good story. Plays well on social media. The world is almost certainly better off with Amazon existing than without, even if they do some heinous stuff.
- staticautomatic 8y agoSuffice it to say you're demonstrably incorrect.
- icelancer 8y agoFunny, I think that about your opinion. Which is what both of our statements are, except that I actually admit it while you and others assert it as fact.
- staticautomatic 8y agoI am making an assertion of fact. If you refuse to treat it as such, that's on you.
- icelancer 8y agoI believe that you believe that.
- staticautomatic 8y agoThen you won't mind explaining why it's not an assertion of fact...