>There is more community consensus that sites should not allow the “www” subdomain to be user controlled. Is there any record of this "consensus"? This shouldn

>There is more community consensus that sites should not allow the “www” subdomain to be user controlled. Is there any record of this "consensus"? This shouldn't be happening, period. There is a difference between example.com and www.example.com: they can serve different content, and can have different DNS records. There is literally no sane reason to hide any subdomain, common or not -- it's there for a reason. Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17927972 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17927972