3 ms·
Someone asked a similar question recently and I suggested an indirect option: use fast, energy- efficient languages and software. It sounds ludicrous and you c
by open-source-ux 8y ago
Someone asked a similar question recently and I suggested an indirect option: use fast, energy- efficient languages and software.
It sounds ludicrous and you can decide for yourself if it is, but consider that there are millions of servers (and desktop and laptop computers) in operation daily. Can you imagine the sheer volume of energy consumed globally? The tech community cares not one iota for such matters - in stark contrast to other industries that have strived for reduced energy-consumption. No, it won't stop climate change, but such wasteful energy use is an important issue that deserves more attention.
Anyway, rather than repeat myself, here's my original comment from the previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17762466 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17762466
- matt_the_bass 8y agoThat’s an I teresting idea I hadn’t thought of before. Thanks for bringing it up.
- yesenadam 8y agoWell, the MBs of ad-related (and other) JS loading with many/most webpages seems the most obvious low-hanging fruit there. And writing this, my screen is shining white. How much energy would a default black instead of white save if used everywhere?