3 ms·
I don't think the authors would argue with you that a friends graph is more useful to real people. I think the theory is that an "interest graph" is more comme
by webwright 16y ago
I don't think the authors would argue with you that a friends graph is more useful to real people. I think the theory is that an "interest graph" is more commercially valuable. If you follow Apple, you're very targetable. If you're friends with your college buddies, you are not.
I think Facebook realizes this-- which is why you're seeing them offering "like" buttons, share buttons, embeddable commenting functionality, etc. I honestly think Facebook is doing as good a job as Twitter at capturing interesting nowadays... And for a broader audience.
- al_james 16y agoYes I agree. My point is that just being a intrest graph service limits the service to the early adopter tech crowd. Facebook are in a much stronger position as (normal) people are there already with their friends, and they can grab the interest graph as well.