3 ms·
Your opening statement of "make something useful to the world and make tons of money in return" is completely antithetical to all discussion in and around this
by ibrault 8y ago
Your opening statement of "make something useful to the world and make tons of money in return" is completely antithetical to all discussion in and around this article. That idea of amoral profit at all costs is exactly the point the employee in the article is refuting.
Point 1 makes no sense, Project Dragonfly demonstrates a willingness to work with the Chinese government in the first place, so this does what for the Chinese people?
And in point 2, your only claim of the provided benefit is less annoying ads? Really? This is not a very convincing argument and reads like standard HN Chinese astroturfing...
- xfer 8y ago> This is not a very convincing argument and reads like standard HN Chinese astroturfing... Why is that not convincing, when you see how popular any ads related discussion in HN is(only yesterday something about brave browser..)?
- netheril96 8y ago> Point 1 makes no sense Because all the companies operating in China already cooperate with the Chinese government. Google entering or not entering China changes nothing about the control of the Chinese government over its people. > so this does what for the Chinese people? Bringing a better search engine back while leaving everything else (like censorship) at its status quo.