3 ms·
I'm not sure where you get "despite the recommended base image being debian". From the best practices docker docs: > Whenever possible, use current official re
by move-on-by 8y ago
I'm not sure where you get "despite the recommended base image being debian". From the best practices docker docs:
> Whenever possible, use current official repositories as the basis for your images. We recommend the Alpine image as it is tightly controlled and small in size (currently under 5 MB), while still being a full Linux distribution. [1]
[1] https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/#from https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_be...
- ownagefool 8y agoThat's today. Debian was the recommended base image previously, and Alpine grew in popularity despite of this. The issues were more around DNS resolution based on musl not having the same bugs as glic (I believe, this is from memory). At the end of the day, I suppose the community has spoken, and docker backed that up by hiring an Alpine developer, and I suppose the rest is history. Not that I intend to be having a go at Alpine, all distros go through this. I was just making the point it's a fairly small distro in contributor numbers, and it seems to have become fairly important to the eco system.