4 ms·
"Edward Snowden surveillance powers ruled unlawful" ? Shouldn't the title be instead "UK surveillance powers ruled unlawful" ?
by fermigier 8y ago
"Edward Snowden surveillance powers ruled unlawful" ?
Shouldn't the title be instead "UK surveillance powers ruled unlawful" ?
- devoply 8y agoI for one want Snowden to immediately stop using his unlawful surveillance powers!
- cantrevealname 8y agoNot only the title -- the article is horribly muddled. Just look at these two lines: The court ruled agencies had violated rights as there were no proper safeguards. The court crucially said bulk interception was legitimate... Apparent contradiction. Further down the page I saw what the reporter was trying to say... maybe. I think it's more likely that he muddled everything and we should wait for better clearer reporting (or read the original court decisions).
- da_chicken 8y agoYeah, it turns out editors are actually pretty important to publishing. QA is important.