3 ms·
It's an accurate one, but you're welcome to add any nuance you feel is necessary and let people respond to it.
by bitlax 8y ago
It's an accurate one, but you're welcome to add any nuance you feel is necessary and let people respond to it.
- danharaj 8y agoWell, for one, intersectionality is about how one describes reality, it is by no means normative and a cursory glance at the wikipedia page indicates as much, with citations if one is so inclined to put any effort at all in thinking critically. But are you?
- smsm42 8y ago> intersectionality is about how one describes reality I am sorry, but this is one of the most useless definitions I've read lately. Almost any human activity and any point of view can be described as "about how one describes reality", from quantum gravity theory to buddhism. And, on top of that, it does not contradict the premise bitlax described above. I am all for thinking critically but if you proclaim that the description above is wrong - and not only just wrong, but so obviously wrong as the wrongness to be obvious to the author, and thus "bad faith" - I think the minimum requirement for you would be to produce a better definition. And "read the wikipedia, it's all there" is not providing a better one.