> homosexuality is detrimental for the persistence of a species. It is entirely a dead-end. How do you state this with such confidence? In an overpopulated wor

> homosexuality is detrimental for the persistence of a species. It is entirely a dead-end. How do you state this with such confidence? In an overpopulated world, homosexuality may be beneficial for the survival of our species. Homosexuals who do not reproduce potentially provide nanny-power to family units, or parenting power to orphans. It is in no way clear cut that "the correct action to be taken is to prevent and/or counter the agent that causes this." This is crazy talk.