I feel for the author, but this article doesn't seem fair to me. For what it's worth, I was working at Facebook when I had a kid and IMO Facebook has really goo

I feel for the author, but this article doesn't seem fair to me. For what it's worth, I was working at Facebook when I had a kid and IMO Facebook has really good parental leave policies. You get four months of leave, but you can use that however you want over the next year. The way that worked for me was taking parental leave days scattered through the year rather than taking off a 4-month chunk of time. So I basically was working part time for a while, even though the article makes it sound like this is impossible. I think the author got a really good deal from Facebook. She worked there for four months, got four months of paid leave, and then quit shortly thereafter. The parental policies are very clear, and she knew she was 5 months pregnant when she took the job, so in a sense this was her plan all along. I don't blame her for leaving when she had a kid. It just seems like chutzpah to complain to the media about Facebook's maternity policies, when those same policies just gave you 4 months of paid leave for a job you only spent 4 months actually working at.