4 ms·
> this current of concern is on the conspiratorial thinking side I wish that it could be possible to address the questions of science directly, without mudslin
by ColanR 8y ago
> this current of concern is on the conspiratorial thinking side
I wish that it could be possible to address the questions of science directly, without mudslinging. It's a simple question of what the effect of EMF radiation is on the environment and the human body, and the risk we run to our detriment if the questions are ignored.
> these people are in the minority of scientists
That is not a problem in science. Science isn't a democracy, it's a fact-finding expedition. Who cares if only a few people got it right? The point is to figure out if they did, and to keep a humble mindset just in case.
- scott_s 8y agoThe questions have been addressed, to the satisfaction of most scientists and medical researchers. When a particular group of scientists refuse to engage with the preponderance of evidence in a good-faith manner, I think we have to point out that is the case.
- alexandercrohde 8y agoSource? I mean this sincerely. Is there actually any polling of the scientific community on this issue, or on what basis are you saying this? [Let's also not include non-researching medical community as data-points]