I find it interesting that the conversation is mainly about fair use and not about false positives. I've been working with filtering and fingerprinting technol

I find it interesting that the conversation is mainly about fair use and not about false positives. I've been working with filtering and fingerprinting technology for some time, and while its "pretty good", false positives happen frequently. Its a case of continual disappointment, even from the largest tech companies with the "best" technology. I expect that widespread "filtering" will equate to widespread non-fair use related false positives. This law is going to work like the DMCA for many providers, carpet bomb everything and worry about the cleanup later.