5 ms·

Microsoft Word (and word processors more generally) are horrible environments for creating any sort of content in. They're great for bureaucrats who like to "do

Microsoft Word (and word processors more generally) are horrible environments for creating any sort of content in. They're great for bureaucrats who like to "do lots of work" without producing anything of use. I cringe every time I have to deal with a Word file.

hfdgiutdryg 8y ago
It sounds like you aren't very good at using Word. Imagine if someone said "I cringe every time I have to deal with a command line."
- _emacsomancer_ 8y ago
  I used Word for a long time, and learned "advanced features". It just sucks compared to real content production software like LaTeX.
- ummonk 8y ago
  Well, a classic command line is a very poor interface to the computer. It's only good because every other interface is so bloated and indirect.
  - hfdgiutdryg 8y ago
    A well-executed command line is a precise and efficient way to get work done. It is invaluable, and its value is unrelated to problems present in other interfaces.
- techntoke 8y ago
  I can use Word, but I prefer to use markup formats or LibreOffice. Why wouldn't I want a piece of bloat that doesn't even work on my OS natively?
- rrix2 8y ago
  > Imagine if someone said "I cringe every time I have to deal with a command line." People do say this though. People have personal preferences for the software they have to use all day, and most of the time people don't agree on what that software is. And most of those decisions are driven by the type of work people do. I don't expect a lawyer or a business analyst to use command line interfaces, and I don't think they expect software engineers to code in Word...
  - hfdgiutdryg 8y ago
    People do say this though And the other people, who were discussing the command line, ignore them. The point is that you can't really criticize something when your criticism seems to boil down to "I don't understand this". And who said anything about writing code in Word? What are you on about?!
  - _emacsomancer_ 8y ago
    Yes, but when I use the command line, it has absolutely no effect on other users who don't like the command line. When someone sends me a .docx, they've made a choice which affects someone else.
com2kid 8y ago
I customized Word with a bunch of Macros, wrote a 300 page educational book in it. I had no issues and was quite productive. I may have been more irritated if I had needed to do a bunch of complicated layout work. For the last year Word has actually supported LaTeX for math equations, see https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2017/07/30/latex-math-in-office/ https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2017/07/30/latex-ma... But aside from that, Word is great for short and medium length documents, especially ones that need group editing. Put a Word file up on Sharepoint, and now there is user friendly change tracking and commenting. I've written multiple technical specs in Word, it serves as a great way to collaborate, so long as everyone has bought into the ecosystem.
- type0 8y ago
  > so long as everyone has bought into the ecosystem. Well that's the problem isn't it, every potential collaborator who can't or won't buy it will be shunned.
  - com2kid 8y ago
    If you are at a company that uses Sharepoint, everyone already has bought in. The same argument can be made for any piece of software. People have to buy in, even free software requires taking time to learning it vs whatever existing workflow is in use (if any).
tomc1985 8y ago
I disagree... for the purpose of editing documents from a nontechnical mindset, Word is fine.
- seabrookmx 8y ago
  Main point being nontechnical mindset. OP points out LaTeX, but for non-technical and non-academic people, this is a non-starter. Word has an extremely low barrier to entry so it makes tons of sense for the general public and K-12 education markets. There's a reason it's so popular and why LibreOffice and GSuite have emulated the bulk of it's feature set.

hfdgiutdryg 8y ago

It sounds like you aren't very good at using Word. Imagine if someone said "I cringe every time I have to deal with a command line."

_emacsomancer_ 8y ago
I used Word for a long time, and learned "advanced features". It just sucks compared to real content production software like LaTeX.
ummonk 8y ago
Well, a classic command line is a very poor interface to the computer. It's only good because every other interface is so bloated and indirect.
- hfdgiutdryg 8y ago
  A well-executed command line is a precise and efficient way to get work done. It is invaluable, and its value is unrelated to problems present in other interfaces.
techntoke 8y ago
I can use Word, but I prefer to use markup formats or LibreOffice. Why wouldn't I want a piece of bloat that doesn't even work on my OS natively?
rrix2 8y ago
> Imagine if someone said "I cringe every time I have to deal with a command line." People do say this though. People have personal preferences for the software they have to use all day, and most of the time people don't agree on what that software is. And most of those decisions are driven by the type of work people do. I don't expect a lawyer or a business analyst to use command line interfaces, and I don't think they expect software engineers to code in Word...
- hfdgiutdryg 8y ago
  People do say this though And the other people, who were discussing the command line, ignore them. The point is that you can't really criticize something when your criticism seems to boil down to "I don't understand this". And who said anything about writing code in Word? What are you on about?!
- _emacsomancer_ 8y ago
  Yes, but when I use the command line, it has absolutely no effect on other users who don't like the command line. When someone sends me a .docx, they've made a choice which affects someone else.

com2kid 8y ago

I customized Word with a bunch of Macros, wrote a 300 page educational book in it. I had no issues and was quite productive. I may have been more irritated if I had needed to do a bunch of complicated layout work. For the last year Word has actually supported LaTeX for math equations, see https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2017/07/30/latex-math-in-office/ https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/murrays/2017/07/30/latex-ma... But aside from that, Word is great for short and medium length documents, especially ones that need group editing. Put a Word file up on Sharepoint, and now there is user friendly change tracking and commenting. I've written multiple technical specs in Word, it serves as a great way to collaborate, so long as everyone has bought into the ecosystem.

type0 8y ago
> so long as everyone has bought into the ecosystem. Well that's the problem isn't it, every potential collaborator who can't or won't buy it will be shunned.
- com2kid 8y ago
  If you are at a company that uses Sharepoint, everyone already has bought in. The same argument can be made for any piece of software. People have to buy in, even free software requires taking time to learning it vs whatever existing workflow is in use (if any).

tomc1985 8y ago

I disagree... for the purpose of editing documents from a nontechnical mindset, Word is fine.

seabrookmx 8y ago
Main point being nontechnical mindset. OP points out LaTeX, but for non-technical and non-academic people, this is a non-starter. Word has an extremely low barrier to entry so it makes tons of sense for the general public and K-12 education markets. There's a reason it's so popular and why LibreOffice and GSuite have emulated the bulk of it's feature set.