4 ms·
Sounds like the web without user content... Web 1.0? So much for free speech.
by arendtio 8y ago
Sounds like the web without user content... Web 1.0? So much for free speech.
- rmrfrmrf 8y agoglances at Facebook timeline well... maybe that won't be so bad afterall.
- sircastor 8y agoWasn't Web 1.0 only user content?
- Natanael_L 8y agoWith a few exceptions, mostly self hosted
- wrs 8y agoIndeed. Of course it was limited to a very small and weird collection of “users”.
- strictnein 8y ago> it was limited to a very small and weird collection of “users” Agreed. It was a much better place.
- arendtio 8y agoWell, I was referring to the definition of the web 2.0. Wikipedia says: Web 2.0, [...] refers to World Wide Web websites that emphasize user-generated content [...][1] So while in the beginning most users were also authors, there was a time between when there were a lot of websites which served content, but didn't let users add theirs. At that time guestbooks were to only place you could add content to someone elses website. To some degree message boards where the start of the Web 2.0. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0
- smsm42 8y agoNo, it was owner content. Of course, for some sites, like my personal Geocities page, the owner frequently was the sole user too, but the concepts of "one entity who owns the site builds the content" and "third parties visiting the site build the content" are different.