5 ms·

So how long will it take people to find a way around this? I mean, I cannot imagine that, for example, the Chans will take this kindly.

yasp 8y ago
Most immediate way around this: block European traffic and/or don't do business in Europe.
sparkling 8y ago
> implying chans give a damn about silly yuropoor laws either way
- AllegedAlec 8y ago
  The users certainly don't, but I think that Hiroshimoot will be rather miffed if he starts getting shit from the EU for not complying with these insane rules.
raverbashing 8y ago
> I cannot imagine that, for example, the Chans will take this kindly. That will be funny
- AllegedAlec 8y ago
  Just imagine how easy it's going to be to screw over other websites, just by making an account, uploading material that could in some way be construed as violating copyright but passes the filter because it cannot be perfect, and then reporting the site to one of the bodies responsible for upholding this directive. Hell, just by doing that you could probably end any potential upholding of this system really fast.
  - raverbashing 8y ago
    Chans have much worse than copyright infringement going on
    - AllegedAlec 8y ago
      I'm not sure if I know what you're talking about. Could you expand on this?
      - chillidoor 8y ago
        Chans allow anonymous users to upload images and historically this leads into a lot of illegal content, especially stuff like child porn, to be uploaded unless you have strict moderation.
        AllegedAlec 8y ago
        > Chans allow anonymous users to upload images and historically this leads into a lot of illegal content Moderation over the last years has been strict though. I haven't seen any illegal content on there in ages.
        chillidoor 8y ago
        That's 4chan. The other big site is 8chan, where users can create their own boards and there are less rules, which makes it much harder to moderate. Then you also have all of the smaller chans which tend to get spammed by bots posting illegal stuff like child porn.
  - dane-pgp 8y ago
    Maybe someone (with a big following on Twitter, let's say) needs to start compiling a list of national government and EU websites that publish user generated content, for example petition sites. If the law goes through, people can go to those sites and post "unexpectedly copyright infringing" content, such as a paragraph from a book (perhaps a self-published one that consists of just seemingly contextless paragraphs). (Inb4 the national laws end up including huge exemptions for site run by the government or political parties). A more technical campaign would be reverse engineering the filtering algorithms (censorship machines) that sites end up forced to install, and finding a way of generating new copyrighted content that has the equivalent of a "hash collision" against already popular (or political) content hosted on websites using the filter.
Agathos 8y ago
Priscilla?
- AllegedAlec 8y ago
  4chan and the other lesser *chans.

yasp 8y ago

Most immediate way around this: block European traffic and/or don't do business in Europe.

sparkling 8y ago

> implying chans give a damn about silly yuropoor laws either way

AllegedAlec 8y ago
The users certainly don't, but I think that Hiroshimoot will be rather miffed if he starts getting shit from the EU for not complying with these insane rules.

raverbashing 8y ago

> I cannot imagine that, for example, the Chans will take this kindly. That will be funny

AllegedAlec 8y ago
Just imagine how easy it's going to be to screw over other websites, just by making an account, uploading material that could in some way be construed as violating copyright but passes the filter because it cannot be perfect, and then reporting the site to one of the bodies responsible for upholding this directive. Hell, just by doing that you could probably end any potential upholding of this system really fast.
- raverbashing 8y ago
  Chans have much worse than copyright infringement going on
  - AllegedAlec 8y ago
    I'm not sure if I know what you're talking about. Could you expand on this?
    - chillidoor 8y ago
      Chans allow anonymous users to upload images and historically this leads into a lot of illegal content, especially stuff like child porn, to be uploaded unless you have strict moderation.
      - AllegedAlec 8y ago
        > Chans allow anonymous users to upload images and historically this leads into a lot of illegal content Moderation over the last years has been strict though. I haven't seen any illegal content on there in ages.
        chillidoor 8y ago
        That's 4chan. The other big site is 8chan, where users can create their own boards and there are less rules, which makes it much harder to moderate. Then you also have all of the smaller chans which tend to get spammed by bots posting illegal stuff like child porn.
- dane-pgp 8y ago
  Maybe someone (with a big following on Twitter, let's say) needs to start compiling a list of national government and EU websites that publish user generated content, for example petition sites. If the law goes through, people can go to those sites and post "unexpectedly copyright infringing" content, such as a paragraph from a book (perhaps a self-published one that consists of just seemingly contextless paragraphs). (Inb4 the national laws end up including huge exemptions for site run by the government or political parties). A more technical campaign would be reverse engineering the filtering algorithms (censorship machines) that sites end up forced to install, and finding a way of generating new copyrighted content that has the equivalent of a "hash collision" against already popular (or political) content hosted on websites using the filter.

Agathos 8y ago

Priscilla?

AllegedAlec 8y ago
4chan and the other lesser *chans.