3 ms·
its down to duty cycle. That figure is the average consumption. I can make most chipsets consume 20uA, its trivial, just don't take them out of hibernation. LT
by KaiserPro 8y ago
its down to duty cycle. That figure is the average consumption. I can make most chipsets consume 20uA, its trivial, just don't take them out of hibernation.
LTE-M is a high(well couple of kilobytes per second) bandwidth, full duplex, high duty cycle transport layer. Not only that, its relatively long distance (well kinda)
Bluetooth is short range < 30m, and at high bandwidth shorter range. yes it can be full duplex, but not at low power (I've not validated that claim though) The BLE beacons don't emit a location every 4 seconds, they also don't have a GPS on all the time eating 35mah.
Lora has a maximum duty cycle of something like 5% (ie it has to be not transmitting 95% of the time) not only that, its not designed for realtime two way communications, It's niche is a sensor reporting the state of a sensor every n minutes.
- MrQuincle 8y agoYou won't be able to achieve the BLE figures with cellular technology. (Even without GPS. ) You just basically say so by explaining how much higher the bandwidth is. The thesis of the author of this article still stands. It's not just GPS.