Why are there no references to the original discovery, the patent(s), or the "snatching" by "cosmetic companies"? The link to the Daily Telegraph is broken (

Why are there no references to the original discovery, the patent(s), or the "snatching" by "cosmetic companies"? The link to the Daily Telegraph is broken ( https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7964109/Scientists-create-dry-water.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7964109/Sci... instead of https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/7964109/Scientists-create-dry-water.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/796410... ) If it was rediscovered at a university in 2006, why are there no publications from that year? At least the ACS is an authoratative source, perhaps that deserves a link? https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2010/august/dry-water-could-make-a-big-splash-commercially.html https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/20...