3 ms·
As a Common Lisp user, I wish more of these one-off lisps would try to be compatible with Common Lisp or Scheme. Both CL and Scheme have pretty good library ec
by jlarocco 8y ago
As a Common Lisp user, I wish more of these one-off lisps would try to be compatible with Common Lisp or Scheme.
Both CL and Scheme have pretty good library ecosystems, though realistically not as rich as more popular languages. Coming out with a brand new, incompatible, Lisp that has an even smaller community isn't very helpful, IMO. Why not at least take advantage of the existing libraries and community?
- shawn 8y agoWorkin' on it! https://gist.github.com/shawwn/333540a1f0b02510d684394979d6b4bb https://gist.github.com/shawwn/333540a1f0b02510d684394979d6b... Those member / assoc / rassoc / rassoc-if / etc definitions come straight out of sbcl's lisp definition file. I'm tellin' ya, Lumen is amazing. You can do everything you can imagine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIYNk4ARUR8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIYNk4ARUR8 The best part is, it's additive work. The communities enhance and inform one another.