The decision to put the content that the NYTimes produces behind a paywall should be the decision of the NYTimes. Regardless of how great the idea is, how noble

The decision to put the content that the NYTimes produces behind a paywall should be the decision of the NYTimes. Regardless of how great the idea is, how noble the intent, and how you're honestly trying to pay for the content, it's not your guys' place to force the NYTimes to accept a third-party payment. It might ultimately turn out that Kachingle's way of doing things is the best solution for the NYTimes, but they should be allowed to come to that conclusion themselves. I'm not sure what your founder's tweet does for this conversation. Thanks for the response Bill.