3 ms·
Yup. Don't argue about defining terms, just ask the defining terms people. Merriam-Webster: a : consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid
by brownbat 8y ago
Yup. Don't argue about defining terms, just ask the defining terms people.
Merriam-Webster:
a : consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)
American Heritage:
1. Covered or soaked with a liquid, such as water: a wet towel.
OED:
1. Covered or saturated with water or another liquid.
Ironically, most dictionaries have fish and submarines easily wet, but don't do a great job of handling the situation where you just get a few drops of rain on you, when you're a little bit wet. They use "covered with," which to me suggests they're only talking about when you're thoroughly wet or submerged.
- tmh88j 8y agoHe laid out what he believes to be the defining term/condition of wet in his mind, and that's what I'm saying is bogus. He's saying completely submerging something means it's not wet. That makes no sense and there is not a single definition I could find that supports that assertion.
- brownbat 8y agoI was agreeing with you. :)
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- likeclockwork 8y agoBy those definitions you're already wet from your own composition.