4 ms·
Depending on how many images you have. Doesn't that mean that it has to download each image and then re-upload them? Could be quite a cost for minimal savings i
by coderdude 16y ago
Depending on how many images you have. Doesn't that mean that it has to download each image and then re-upload them? Could be quite a cost for minimal savings if you have a large number of images to store.
Edit: I'm talking about 20,000+ product images, not the images or files associated with a layout.
- njharman 16y ago> Could be quite a cost for minimal savings if you have a large number of images Could be, could be a large saving for minimal investment in time+money. depends on how much downloading of the images occurs normally.
- bluesmoon 16y agoThe blog post mentions how he fixes the issue (at least for repeated runs)
- nostromo 16y ago> minimal savings For me this isn't about saving money, it's about load time.
- bkrausz 16y agoWouldn't it be free (or close to it) if you run it on an EC2 instance?