2 ms·
A big takeaway for me is how the internal security teams knew it was bad and couldn't make a case for the change. Once a process is in place, it takes a well d
by move-on-by 8y ago
A big takeaway for me is how the internal security teams knew it was bad and couldn't make a case for the change.
Once a process is in place, it takes a well delivered argument to make a change. Not allowing paste into password fields is a prime example of something that seems like a good practice, but isn't. If anyone is reading this and needs to convince others to allow paste, NIST says to allow pasting passwords, and that it improves security:
> Verifiers SHOULD permit claimants to use “paste” functionality when entering a memorized secret. This facilitates the use of password managers, which are widely used and in many cases increase the likelihood that users will choose stronger memorized secrets. [1]
People will no doubt still say it's bad, but its a fact that the National Institute of Standards and Technology says to allow paste, and that it improves security
[1] https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63b.html https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63b.html