3 ms·
I think GP's point is that people who have fun driving drive more frequently, which is inherently unsafe.
by InitialLastName 8y ago
I think GP's point is that people who have fun driving drive more frequently, which is inherently unsafe.
- mulmen 8y agoIt’s unclear to me that more driving equates to more danger. Driving is currently very unsafe but that is a product of the drivers. If drivers were safer driving itself would also be safer.
- InitialLastName 8y agoEvery extra person driving a car adds to the total risk to everyone. I'm of the understanding that "safer" driving is a function with an asymptote well above zero, i.e. there's only so much that a person's skill as a safe driver will improve the net safety of the system. I'd like to add that I'm not just talking about the safety of the extra person driving; there's also the safety of the other road users, whether in cars, on motorcycles, on bicycles, or on foot. An extra driver on the road raises the net risk for everyone. Additionally, in my experience the intersection of "drives for fun" and "drives safely" is so close to zero that it's not worth considering.
- sevensor 8y agoIndeed. As a cyclist, I'm absolutely safer when there is less traffic. Less traffic means motorists have fewer other moving objects to distract them from not killing me.