I never said thugs. That was someone else. I said assholes. Plus, you have defined "thug" as "people who cannot produce anything themselves" and are holding e

I never said thugs. That was someone else. I said assholes. Plus, you have defined "thug" as "people who cannot produce anything themselves" and are holding everyone to that definition even though no one else has agreed that that is an acceptable definition of thug. Which is kind of funny considering the root of the word thug traces its roots to an order of thieves and assassins in India. So stop focusing on the word "thug", it's a pointless diversion and doesn't really answer the question: What do you do when a stronger, organized force decides that it wants what you have? Saying "It won't happen because thugs don't join gangs and we'll have all the guns because only good people make shit" is Platonic ideal of naivety.