AGPL is a tiny subset of open source software, and even then it's intended to allow cloud infrastructure companies to sell covered works. It's certainly the cas

AGPL is a tiny subset of open source software, and even then it's intended to allow cloud infrastructure companies to sell covered works. It's certainly the case that there's an intent to prevent certain pieces of open source software from unconditionally being used in this way, but I don't think it's reasonable to argue that there was a fundamental incompatibility between the original ethos and what's happening now.