4 ms·
So an eye for an eye, huh? The thing is, publicly shaming someone is a very lazy way to effect change. Sure it might work for corporations, but if there's resi
by coleifer 8y ago
So an eye for an eye, huh?
The thing is, publicly shaming someone is a very lazy way to effect change. Sure it might work for corporations, but if there's resistance it may be necessary to try reaching out to the decision makers via a different communication channel. I don't think it's appropriate to ratchet up the shaming and outrage.
- TimothyBJacobs 8y agoThis is addressed in the article. There were numerous instances of internal security teams trying to effect change, but were completely ignored by the powers that be.
- pavel_lishin 8y ago> The thing is, publicly shaming someone is a very lazy way to effect change. Effective, too! Sounds like a win for me, a human being who isn't paid to ensure that other companies keep their systems secure.