> 1) The contributors give you the right to license the software how you see fit. Thus, they are not able to get commercial benefit from the software, but you a

> 1) The contributors give you the right to license the software how you see fit. Thus, they are not able to get commercial benefit from the software, but you are. Sure. But that's compared to the 3-clause BSD situation currently where no one at all is getting the commercial benefit in the majority of cases. And developers are already used to deferring to the main developer-- who is quite often the original author. In the rare case of Paul Davis subsisting on monthly donations in a free software project (Ardour), I have a hard time believing that people aren't submitting patches because he gets money.