4 ms·
In WatermelonDB's case, I bet most people will run it using React Native (ie mobile apps for iOS and Android), so that wouldn't really be an issue. On the othe
by p0peax 8y ago
In WatermelonDB's case, I bet most people will run it using React Native (ie mobile apps for iOS and Android), so that wouldn't really be an issue.
On the other hand, sql.js (https://github.com/kripken/sql.js/ https://github.com/kripken/sql.js/) packs to about 2,6MB (see http://kripken.github.io/sql.js/js/worker.sql.js http://kripken.github.io/sql.js/js/worker.sql.js). I don't know about performance under heavy use of that. I don't know what SQLite backend WatermelonDB uses from ReactJS either.