4 ms·
Sure but with 99% accuracy across 3 different locations, the chances are, the suspect is lying.
by Blaiz0r 8y ago
Sure but with 99% accuracy across 3 different locations, the chances are, the suspect is lying.
- hidenotslide 8y ago1) Those tests results would be highly correlated, so you wouldn't necessarily be much more than 99% accurate still. 2) If the prior probability of someone committing a crime on a given night is low, you are in the classical example of false positives doing harm via Bayes rule.