3 ms·
I think you got it backwards. It's good that this worked for you, but this kind of thinking leads to a race to the bottom where the original cause is continuall
by projektir 8y ago
I think you got it backwards. It's good that this worked for you, but this kind of thinking leads to a race to the bottom where the original cause is continually increased until individuals who can get out of it basically cease to exist.
What's important is not whether some individuals can pull out. What's important is the overall effect.
- tw1010 8y agoI totally agree that it's a systemic problem and that society shouldn't ignore it. I'm not trying to shift blame from institution to individuals, it's just that I myself have noticed that thinking too much about how this was a problem in the bigger picture put unnecessary friction in a project that was already challenging enough (going from an unhealthy state to a healthy state). Just because I'm talking about this in public doesn't mean this is how I think the public think about it. Imagine my original comment as advice given in a dimly lit intimate one-on-one conversation, not something I'm shouting from a stage. I want institutions and policymakers to think of it as a systemic problem, but I want individuals to know that the most efficient strategy for they themselves is to ignore all the worlds ills and focus on using their limited energy in a way that is least likely to fail.