According to [1] Carl Hewitt, the guy advocating for this encyclopedia has disrupted Wikipedia for more than two years by using it for self-promotion, tamperin

According to [1] Carl Hewitt, the guy advocating for this encyclopedia has disrupted Wikipedia for more than two years by using it for self-promotion, tampering with his own biography and manipulating computer science articles to inflate the importance of his own research. How would be assured that the members of the "editorial board" of the encyclopedia wouldn't use it for their own benefit inflating the importance of their research, like allegedly Carl did? [1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2007/dec/09/wikipedia.internet https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2007/dec/09/wikipedia...