5 ms·
The exchange is where the orders are executed, but the exchange doesn't execute the orders. The market makers do that job. Look at the companies listed in the
by OldHand2018 8y ago
The exchange is where the orders are executed, but the exchange doesn't execute the orders. The market makers do that job.
Look at the companies listed in the disclosures. Citadel appears to have the largest share in all of the examples listed. Their website [1] claims that:
> We act as a specialist or market maker in more than 3,000 U.S. listed-options names, representing 99% of traded volume, and rank as a top liquidity provider on the major U.S. options exchanges, executing approximately 39% of all U.S.-listed retail volume, making us the industry’s top wholesale market maker.
Citadel is paying Robinhood to put your limit order into their system at the NYSE or NASDAQ or whatever other exchange and then they handle the execution of it. Also, I don't believe that this article is claiming that Citadel et al are the high frequency traders, but that the high frequency traders are connected to their platforms and profiting (in some unspecified manner) from the orders that come in.
[1] https://www.citadelsecurities.com/products/equities-and-options/ https://www.citadelsecurities.com/products/equities-and-opti...
- nostrademons 8y agoIt's been over a decade (2007) since I dealt with order books, but when I was looking at this (writing a product to detect trade-throughs), it was a Reg NMS violation to execute an order for a price worse than the best listed on an exchange at the time. ...OTOH, what that product revealed was that Reg NMS violations were pretty rampant and the SEC wasn't interested in doing anything about it. You may have difficulty enforcing this.
- rapsey 8y ago> it was a Reg NMS violation to execute an order for a price worse than the best listed on an exchange at the time. Orders take time to process. HFT guys are fast enough to react and make money from it.