17 ms·
I can't really comment on the user side of Pinterest, but on the financial side. * It's a walled garden, closed source, forced signup, the UX is bad (dominatin
by ReverseCold 8y ago
I can't really comment on the user side of Pinterest, but on the financial side.
* It's a walled garden, closed source, forced signup, the UX is bad (dominating Google Image Search taking you to pictures you can't click), lots of dark patterns. As a result, users can't leave. This leads to more money.
* It heavily suggests signing up with Facebook or Google, who help Pinterest make a lot of money through tracking.
* It has all the features for the mob-mentality, abuse and so on (Like system, sharing, popularity based rankings). This keeps users on the site, which makes Pinterest more money.
Pinterest is just following common, tried and true strategies. Good for them.
-- end --
It doesn't look like there is a viable way to fix this.
Honestly the best solution I can think of would be to have a well-funded benevolent organization that fights for user privacy and makes products good/easy enough to be popular. Unfortunately, no such organization exists.
- anonymfus 8y agoMozilla?
- petepete 8y agoI hate how Pinterest results appear in Google Image Searches then tries to make me sign up/log in to see the result. Google didn't like it when Experts Exchange used to pull that kind of trick.
- ryandrake 8y agoIs there some incantation you can type into the search box that excludes Pinterest-hosted results?
- rchaud 8y agoI think it's "[search term' -pinterest.com], but I'd need to double check. GIS has started to de-emphasize Pinterest hits though, but for some queries like "furniture", there's probably still tons of hits from there.